• Smithsonian
    Instiution
  • Smithsonian
    Journeys
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Smithsonian
    magazine

AirSpaceMag.com

  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Need to Know
  • How Things Work
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • The Daily Planet
  • Letters To Earth
  • The Once and Future Moon
  • The View from 30,000 Feet
  • On Air
The Once and Future Moon Blog, Written by Paul D. Spudis

August 21, 2009

Scientists vs. The Icy Commander

The path to Cone crater (LROC image, Ariz. State Univ.)

The path to Cone crater (LROC image, Ariz. State Univ.)

In 1961, Alan B. Shepard’s successful 15-minute sub-orbital hop gave President Kennedy the high cover needed to announce a reach for the Moon, “by the end of this decade.” America’s spirit was lifted and Alan Shepard became a national hero, getting ticker tape parades and White House receptions. Then, as in a Greek tragedy, he was struck from the flight list after developing Meniere’s syndrome (an imbalance of the inner ear). His flying days were over. Or were they?

Shepard, a smart, tough, no-nonsense aviator, took a job helping Deke Slayton (previously grounded by a heart murmur) run the Astronaut Office. Shepard and Slayton picked all flight crews for the Gemini and Apollo missions. Very early on, it became clear that you did not cross Al Shepard, lest your career come to a screeching halt. Shepard never stopped his Apollo training or flying in the T-38, even though he had to “backseat it” with another astronaut. His personality was memorably captured in Tom Wolfe’s book, The Right Stuff, as “The Icy Commander.”

After taking a chance on experimental surgery to correct his inner ear problem in 1969, he successfully returned to active flight status and looked ahead to an Apollo flight assignment.  Rejected for the Commander’s seat on the next available flight by NASA Headquarters (on the grounds that he needed more training time), he was named to command a subsequent flight, while Jim Lovell was named Commander of Apollo 13.

Geologists who worked on the Apollo training were ecstatic – Lovell was one of their favorite pilot astronauts, a smart, capable guy with a keen eye and an analytic mind. He was being sent to Fra Mauro, the first highland site to be visited on the Moon. This region was considered a key locale to decipher lunar geological history, being located on the ejecta blanket of the Imbrium basin, the largest impact crater on the near side.

Jim Lovell was considered the right man to study this site and collect the key samples scientists needed to help unlock the secrets of the Moon. Unfortunately, with the failure of Apollo 13, Jim Lovell didn’t land on the Moon. Still, the Fra Mauro site was considered so important, it became the designated landing site for Apollo 14, eighteen months later.

Uh-oh. Lunar scientists didn’t have Jim Lovell to explore with—they had drawn the “Icy Commander,” the guy who cheerfully admitted that, compared to aeronautics, he thought geology was a low-grade science. Nevertheless, Shepard assured the Apollo scientists he would try to do the best job he could for them.

While successful in almost every way, the Apollo 14 mission was not without controversy. Cone crater, a large young impact feature, had apparently dug up rocks from deep within the Fra Mauro Formation, including it was hoped, ejecta from the Imbrium basin. During their second moonwalk, Al Shepard and Ed Mitchell trudged up steep slopes leading to Cone, dragging along their Modularized Equipment Transporter (MET), a small pull-cart designed to carry tools and samples with them, getting more winded and disoriented with each step. Getting to the rim of Cone crater was considered critical to the scientific success of the mission.

At 47, Shepard was the oldest man to fly to the Moon and many felt that he was out of shape and not up to the rigors of lunar trekking (which didn’t explain why Ed Mitchell was also having problems.) Moreover, it seemed that Shepard was all too eager to abandon the trek and declare victory after he radioed to the ground that he thought they were already at the rim of Cone crater. (Enough with the hiking trip! We’re running out of time and consumables. Let’s sample this area and call it the rim of Cone crater.)

Scientists in the back room were aghast. Getting Cone crater samples was critical to mission success. And now this old, panting geezer was destroying their chance to unlock a deep secret about the Moon. Although they put on a good face, scientists were resentful; after all their work on geological training, the “Icy Commander” simply declares victory and turns for home. Adding insult to their perceived injury, back at the Lunar Module, Shepard pulled out a 6-iron and conducted a little sand trap practice. (He abandoned the quest for Cone crater – to play golf, no less!)

Now, thirty-eight years later, we’ve just received a magnificent picture of the Apollo 14 landing site from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Its quality is so good we can see the path of the astronauts footprints and MET tracks on the Moon. It is even possible to follow their tracks all the way up to Cone crater—to the point where Al Shepard declared victory.

Oops. Al Shepard was right. He was at the rim of Cone crater. Terrain around the rim is so hilly that he and Ed Mitchell didn’t know they had reached the rim; the deep crater interior is just over a slight rise, a few tens of meters north of where they were. The samples that Shepard and Mitchell collected do represent the deepest ejecta from Cone crater, thereby fulfilling that goal geologists set many moons ago. For almost 40 years, the “Icy Commander” was right. Yet his name lived in infamy in lunar geologic circles.

If there is a moral to this story, it could be that scientists should never state something is absolutely known and settled.  It’s likely they’ll be proven wrong.



Posted By: Paul D. Spudis — Lunar Exploration,Lunar Science,Space and Society | Link | Comments (9)

Share/Save Tweet Digg



9 Comments »

  1. [...] Scientists vs. The Icy Commander | The Once and Future Moon blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/08/21/scientists-vs-the-icy-commander – view page – cached [caption id=attachment_443 align=alignright width=300 caption=The path to Cone crater (LROC image, Ariz. State Univ.)][/caption] In 1961, Alan B., [caption id=attachment_443 align=alignright width=300 caption=The path to Cone crater (LROC image, Ariz. State Univ.)][/caption] In 1961, Alan B. — From the page [...]

    Pingback by Twitter Trackbacks for Scientists vs. The Icy Commander | The Once and Future Moon [airspacemag.com] on Topsy.com — August 22, 2009 @ 12:45 am


  2. We never doubted we were at the top. Photos proved it

    Comment by Edgar Mitchell — August 22, 2009 @ 9:36 am


  3. Hi Ed,

    Thanks for dropping by and commenting. Indeed the photos did, but sometimes the objective truth gets buried by people’s impressions and that was my theme.

    Anyway, the post-mission photos have now been corroborated by the new LRO data.

    Come back often!

    Best,
    Paul

    Comment by Paul D. Spudis — August 22, 2009 @ 10:04 am


  4. Can you please name the offending geologists?

    Comment by Dwayne Day — August 23, 2009 @ 4:10 pm


  5. Hi Dwayne,

    I could but I choose not to. My point stands without naming any specific person on the science team.

    Cheers!
    Paul

    Comment by Paul D. Spudis — August 23, 2009 @ 5:36 pm


  6. There’s an even larger lesson to be learned from this. It’s not just that scientists — even when they agree with each other completely after long discussion — can be wrong. It’s that anyone can be wrong. There are sets of conditions when the Alan Sheppard style of leadership is quite correct. To use one famous example, long, thoughtful discussion of what to do next would have been hilariously inappropriate on Normandy beach on June 6, 1944. Perhaps even under the conditions present on the Moon during the Apollo explorations. After all, if the astronauts had died on the Moon, then those samples would not have come back.

    On the other hand, many people argue that the kind of leadership exhibited by Sheppard in the astronaut office and on the Moon is today holding back progress in space exploration and development. Ever hear the phrase “Not Invented Here”? That kind of close minded behavior stifles further development.

    Comment by Chuck Divine — August 24, 2009 @ 9:06 am


  7. That, sir, is an open question IMHO–whether we suffer from too much or too little Alan Shepard-style management. There is a difference between true closed-mindedness, and a single-minded determination to succeed.

    Comment by Warren Platts — August 28, 2009 @ 12:23 am


  8. Glad I found this, since other outlets make it seems as if they didn’t quite reach the rim. So was it close enough to the geologic features, just not close enough to say “I’m on the crater rim!” ?

    They were 30 meters short of seeing into the crater itself, apparently.

    http://www.universetoday.com/2009/08/20/latest-lro-image-solves-apollo-14-mystery/

    Comment by Ralph H — September 30, 2009 @ 4:57 pm


  9. So was it close enough to the geologic features, just not close enough to say “I’m on the crater rim!” ?

    Yes. Their objective was to sample the rim of Cone crater, where the deepest ejecta presumably would occur. They did that. Mission accomplished.

    Comment by Paul D. Spudis — October 1, 2009 @ 4:56 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Airspacemag.com has approved them. Airspacemag.com reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies. Airspacemag.com and the author also reserve the right to reprint comments submitted to the blog.

Advertisement



  • Join Us!

    1.  Twitter
    2.  Subscribe to RSS

  • About

    Paul D. Spudis is a Senior Staff Scientist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas. The opinions expressed are his own, and do not reflect the views of his employer or the Smithsonian Institution.
    Read full bio »
  • Recent Posts

    • The Flight of the Dragon
    • The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers*
    • Analogy for Space: Aviation or Seafaring?
    • A Scientific Dispute
    • Legacy of a Space Titan
  • Categories

    • Lunar Exploration
    • Lunar Resources
    • Lunar Science
    • Space and Society
    • Space Politics
    • Space Transportation
  • Blogroll

    • AmericaSpace
    • Apollo Image Archive
    • Apollo Image Gallery
    • Apollo Lunar Surface Journal
    • Astronaut Tom Jones Flight Notes
    • Behind the Black
    • Beyond Apollo
    • Coalition for Space Exploration (Leonard David)
    • Commercial Space Gateway
    • Cosmic Log
    • Curmudgeon’s Corner
    • Dennis Wingo
    • Google Lunar X Prize
    • Leading Space
    • Letters to Earth (Don Pettit)
    • Lunar and Planetary Institute: Lunar Exploration
    • Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (LEAG)
    • Lunar Missions
    • Lunar Networks
    • Lunar Photo of the Day (LPOD)
    • Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC)
    • Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission
    • Mini-RF Experiments
    • Moon Today
    • Moon Views
    • NASA Space History Page
    • NASA Spaceflight.com
    • NASA Watch
    • nasaengineer.com
    • National Space Society
    • New Papyrus
    • On Space (Aviation Week)
    • Out of the Cradle
    • Planetary Society Blog
    • RLV and Space Transport News
    • Rockets and Such
    • Roger Launius's Blog
    • RV-103.com
    • Selenian Boondocks
    • Space Daily
    • Space Exploration Resources
    • Space Today
    • Space.com
    • Spudis Lunar Resources
    • The Space Show
    • The Space Show Blog
    • Transterrestrial Musings
    • Unmanned Spaceflight
    • Wayne Hale's Blog
  • Blogs from AirSpaceMag.com

    • Letters to Earth (Don Pettit)
    • The Daily Planet By the editors of Air & Space magazine
    • The View from 30,000 Feet By Steve Satre
  • Archives



Advertisement



Subscribe to Air & Space Magazine


View full archiveRecent Issues


  • 2011


  • 2010


  • 2009

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Member Services
  • About Air & Space
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics

Smithsonian Institution

Produced by Clickability