<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Space Program vs. Space Commerce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/07/16/space-program-vs-space-commerce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/07/16/space-program-vs-space-commerce/</link>
	<description>The Once and Future Moon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:44:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Next Step or No Step &#124; The Once and Future Moon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/07/16/space-program-vs-space-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Step or No Step &#124; The Once and Future Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=377#comment-712</guid>
		<description>[...] claims about “exciting the public” with a human Mars mission, regardless of their veracity (which is doubtful), do not translate into higher budgets for NASA. To go to Mars using existing technology, with an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] claims about “exciting the public” with a human Mars mission, regardless of their veracity (which is doubtful), do not translate into higher budgets for NASA. To go to Mars using existing technology, with an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Matula</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/07/16/space-program-vs-space-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Matula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=377#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Paul,

I agree. What is needed now is not a new NASA program, subject to all the political whims that buffet NASA constantly, but a public/private partnership outside of NASA. One that would stay focused on infrastructure and sustainability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>I agree. What is needed now is not a new NASA program, subject to all the political whims that buffet NASA constantly, but a public/private partnership outside of NASA. One that would stay focused on infrastructure and sustainability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Platts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/07/16/space-program-vs-space-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Platts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=377#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Good points Paul. Probably Americans were more ambivalent about the Moon Shot than the rest of the world. One need look no further than that classic Gil Scott Heron tune for evidence of that! 

Just found your blog today, sir. It&#039;s awesome! Keep up the good work! 

PS: We need to get you on coasttocoastam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Paul. Probably Americans were more ambivalent about the Moon Shot than the rest of the world. One need look no further than that classic Gil Scott Heron tune for evidence of that! </p>
<p>Just found your blog today, sir. It&#8217;s awesome! Keep up the good work! </p>
<p>PS: We need to get you on coasttocoastam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frediiiie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/07/16/space-program-vs-space-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Frediiiie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=377#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Exactly right. 
Nobody cares about the airline. It&#039;s all about were it takes you. 
Apollo was great, but what we need now is a dull, boring, flight-now-boarding-at-gate-nine, spaceline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly right.<br />
Nobody cares about the airline. It&#8217;s all about were it takes you.<br />
Apollo was great, but what we need now is a dull, boring, flight-now-boarding-at-gate-nine, spaceline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hensley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/07/16/space-program-vs-space-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Hensley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=377#comment-671</guid>
		<description>The problem today is that people don&#039;t just complain about the government &quot;wasting&quot; its money on space travel, they even complain when private citizens &quot;waste&quot; their money on space travel. The argument is, how dare you spend large sums of money on frivolous pursuits when we haven&#039;t solved [global warming, world hunger, HIV/AIDS, universal healthcare...pick your favorite crisis]. I think these people are being hypocritical, but I&#039;m not likely to convince them of that. (Let&#039;s see, did you go to a movie in the past year? Why didn&#039;t you donate that $10 to Greenpeace?)

The bottom line is those who want to go to space are going to have to do it in spite of the naysayers. That crowd isn&#039;t going away, no matter how much the private sector accomplishes. They simply have different values (and a faulty set of economic principles, too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem today is that people don&#8217;t just complain about the government &#8220;wasting&#8221; its money on space travel, they even complain when private citizens &#8220;waste&#8221; their money on space travel. The argument is, how dare you spend large sums of money on frivolous pursuits when we haven&#8217;t solved [global warming, world hunger, HIV/AIDS, universal healthcare...pick your favorite crisis]. I think these people are being hypocritical, but I&#8217;m not likely to convince them of that. (Let&#8217;s see, did you go to a movie in the past year? Why didn&#8217;t you donate that $10 to Greenpeace?)</p>
<p>The bottom line is those who want to go to space are going to have to do it in spite of the naysayers. That crowd isn&#8217;t going away, no matter how much the private sector accomplishes. They simply have different values (and a faulty set of economic principles, too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
