<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: moon vs. Moon: A Study in Arrant Pedantry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/04/02/moon-vs-moon-a-study-in-arrant-pedantry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/04/02/moon-vs-moon-a-study-in-arrant-pedantry/</link>
	<description>The Once and Future Moon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:44:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Paul D. Spudis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/04/02/moon-vs-moon-a-study-in-arrant-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Paul D. Spudis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=244#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Brian,

I agree with you.  A lowercase &quot;martian&quot; is an adjective.  When &quot;Martian&quot; is capitalized, it is a noun and refers to an inhabitant of Mars, as in &quot;Marvin is a Martian.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>I agree with you.  A lowercase &#8220;martian&#8221; is an adjective.  When &#8220;Martian&#8221; is capitalized, it is a noun and refers to an inhabitant of Mars, as in &#8220;Marvin is a Martian.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Shiro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/04/02/moon-vs-moon-a-study-in-arrant-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Shiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=244#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this well-stated post.  I got into an argument with a colleague once on the subject of whether &quot;martian&quot; should be capitalized.  I argued that it should not because it is an adjective, just like &quot;lunar.&quot;  What is your position?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this well-stated post.  I got into an argument with a colleague once on the subject of whether &#8220;martian&#8221; should be capitalized.  I argued that it should not because it is an adjective, just like &#8220;lunar.&#8221;  What is your position?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pillownaut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/04/02/moon-vs-moon-a-study-in-arrant-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Pillownaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=244#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Well said.  I always capitalize &quot;Moon&quot; and find it pet-peevy if I see it with a lower-case m.  All other satellites have proper names -- just as ours used to.  First it was the Greek Goddess Selene, then the Roman (Latin) Luna.  The idea that we&#039;ve added an article to it, making it &quot;the Moon&quot; doesn&#039;t make it any less a prominent satellite deserving of a proper name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.  I always capitalize &#8220;Moon&#8221; and find it pet-peevy if I see it with a lower-case m.  All other satellites have proper names &#8212; just as ours used to.  First it was the Greek Goddess Selene, then the Roman (Latin) Luna.  The idea that we&#8217;ve added an article to it, making it &#8220;the Moon&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make it any less a prominent satellite deserving of a proper name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Stooke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/04/02/moon-vs-moon-a-study-in-arrant-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Stooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=244#comment-348</guid>
		<description>I capitalized Moon in my atlas, and (if my memory is correct, it was a while ago) I checked the preface to your book before deciding to do so.  As it coincided with my own preference, it had to be right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I capitalized Moon in my atlas, and (if my memory is correct, it was a while ago) I checked the preface to your book before deciding to do so.  As it coincided with my own preference, it had to be right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Spence</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/04/02/moon-vs-moon-a-study-in-arrant-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=244#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Most of the questionable decisions I&#039;ve found in AP style (e.g. lower-casing &quot;the President&quot;) appear to be based not on grammar or other logic but simply upon type size. A capital _M_ takes up more room in the line of type; newspapers want to pack as many words into the column-inch as possible; ergo they&#039;ll use the smaller alphanumeric character, in this case the little _m_.

And although it could be argued that there is only one true &quot;moon&quot; and all others are merely satellites (since their period of revolution is not a month), I would still like to see this exclusivity emphasized with a capital _M_.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the questionable decisions I&#8217;ve found in AP style (e.g. lower-casing &#8220;the President&#8221;) appear to be based not on grammar or other logic but simply upon type size. A capital _M_ takes up more room in the line of type; newspapers want to pack as many words into the column-inch as possible; ergo they&#8217;ll use the smaller alphanumeric character, in this case the little _m_.</p>
<p>And although it could be argued that there is only one true &#8220;moon&#8221; and all others are merely satellites (since their period of revolution is not a month), I would still like to see this exclusivity emphasized with a capital _M_.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Wood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/2009/04/02/moon-vs-moon-a-study-in-arrant-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/?p=244#comment-319</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree! 
The Moon is a specific place, whose beauty and uniqueness deserves capitalization far more than all the little runt satellites of the outer planets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree!<br />
The Moon is a specific place, whose beauty and uniqueness deserves capitalization far more than all the little runt satellites of the outer planets!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
