August 14, 2012
How Do You Name an Aircraft Carrier?

A E-2C Hawkeye on the flight deck of the USS Harry S. Truman, circa 2005. Each ship has a sponsor—a living woman, normally a civilian—who is considered a permanent member of the ship's crew, and is considered to bestow a part of her personality to the ship. Photograph by Phan Kristopher Wilson/DoD.
Last month, the U.S. Navy submitted a report to Congress outlining the policies and practices for naming Navy vessels. (The 82-page document provides a history of how the practice has evolved over time; download a pdf of the report here.)
The report, prepared by the Department of the Navy staff, highlights the tensions between “orthodox traditionalists” (those who believe that Navy ship names should remain faithful to naming conventions), and “pragmatic traditionalists” (those who view orthodox traditionalists as too rigid). The two groups have been able to work together in the past, however. Consider this: By 1968, the only active ship named in honor of a U.S. state was the USS New Jersey, an Iowa-class battleship. With battleships no longer in production, the report notes, state names were chosen to be applied to nuclear-powered guided missile frigates, as it was expected that 25 would be built. But only six were manufactured; so in 1975, Secretary of the Navy J. William Middendorf decided that nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile submarines should carry state names. “Consequently,” notes the report, “in the 1980s, the Navy’s battle force included three different types of ships in four different classes named for States of the Union.”

The USS Franklin D. Roosevelt in the Mediterranean Sea, circa 1977. Photograph by John Wilson, U.S. Navy.
Which brings us to carriers. The Navy’s first carrier (a converted collier), the USS Langley, was named for aviation pioneer Samuel P. Langley, the inventor of the Aerodrome, and the third Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. When the Navy was compelled to stop building battle cruisers after 1923, Secretary of the Navy Edwin Denby decided that new construction aircraft carriers (CVs) should be named after “historic Naval Vessels or battles” (think Lexington, Saratoga, Ranger, Yorktown, Enterprise, Wasp, and Hornet). Once World War II began, the convention was modified to “famous old ships and important battles of our history and present world war”—and included Independence-class light fleet carriers (CVLs).
During World War II, as the Navy began to acquire escort carriers, Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox decided to separate them from CVs and CVLs by naming them after “sounds, bays, and islands.” (This was later amended to “sounds, bays, islands, and famous American battles.”)
By VJ Day (August 14, 1945), all of the Navy’s 28 fleet carriers and 71 escort carriers—save one—followed their naming conventions. The exception was an aircraft carrier named Shangri-La, meant to memorialize the famous 1942 Doolittle Raid on Tokyo. (The report notes that “to protect the fact that the raid had been launched from an American aircraft carrier, President Roosevelt announced the attack had been launched from a new secret base at ‘Shangri-La,’ the fictional faraway land in James Hilton’s novel Lost Horizon.”)
As World War II concluded, carrier naming convention was again modified. After President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s death, Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal recommended to President Harry S. Truman that the second of the new Midway-class carriers be named in Roosevelt’s honor. It was the first time since the Langley that a carrier had been named after an individual.
In 1968, the USS John F. Kennedy was commissioned, and the orthodox traditionalist group recommended that future aircraft carrier names be considered on an individual basis. While carriers are now generally named in honor of past U.S. Presidents, some exceptions have been made, such as the USS Carl Vinson (in honor of Congressman Carl Vinson, known as “the father of the two-Ocean Navy”), and the USS John C. Stennis (named in honor of Senator John Stennis, and known as “the father of America’s modern Navy”).








I think naming carriers after distinguished naval and marine aviators such as McClusky, Sheppard, Foss, and Boyington would be a good idea. And perhaps, when Enterprise is retired, her replacement not only gets the name, but also the hull number — CVN 65 — with an “A” added to the number. Yes, this is from Star Trek.
Comment by Tom Vallejos — August 14, 2012 @ 2:11 pm
As a 20+ year Navy veteran, I fully understand the need for “flexibility” (quotes added for irony!)with respect to ship naming. I do, however, strongly object to the current practice of using ship names as political payback to any individual or political party. Certainly, ship names like “Enterprise”, “Ranger”, and “Lexington” bring to mind famous U.S. sailing ships and heroic battles, as they should. When telling the average American you are a proud crewmember “USS Carl Vinson”, (no disrespect to CVN-70 or her crew intended) the reply is most likely to be “who?”
The solution for this issue is simple – Congress should pass a law that prohibits naming a ship after any individual until they have been deceased for at least 100 years. At that point, they will be looked at in the bright light of historical reality, and the ship will have a name to be proud of, rather than a politician who was owed favors.
Comment by Ed Dillingham — August 20, 2012 @ 9:33 am
I fully agree with Ed Dillingham; the names of naval vessels should not be political payback, though the US Navy is on the right track in naming its amphibious assault ships after famous battles, like Bataan, Peleliu, Tarawa and so on.
Follow the British example and use more solemn names. Past and present UK carriers like Ocean, Illustrious, Invincible, Ark Royal, Hermes, Eagle, and so on (including the wonderfully-named but never completed Leviathan), are much more dignified and inspiring. The upcoming carriers the Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales are similarly well-chosen.
Any ideas, anyone, for what to call CVN-80 and onward?
Comment by Mark Mallari — September 11, 2012 @ 5:46 am
The CVN 78 class carriers should be named MIDWAY class carriers because the battle of Midway is the turning point of WW2 and it is the most significant naval air battle in history. The navy should honor the sacrifices made by those WW2 Naval Aviators who bravely fought against great odds and emerged victorious.
Comment by jay — December 7, 2012 @ 3:06 am
As ex-Navy, I believe that NO ship be named for a politician or President, unless that politician or President had been a member of the US Navy. How many Army or Air Force bases do you see that are named after a person that wasn`t a soldier or airman at one time? Let the Army and Air Force name theirs, but leave the ships to Sailors if a persons name is to used.
Comment by Dennis Shook — May 10, 2013 @ 7:34 pm