<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London&#8217;s Armed Rooftops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/2012/07/londons-armed-rooftops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/2012/07/londons-armed-rooftops/</link>
	<description>AirSpaceMag.com Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 08:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Huizenga</title>
		<link>http://blogs.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/2012/07/londons-armed-rooftops/comment-page-1/#comment-6804</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Huizenga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/?p=19388#comment-6804</guid>
		<description>Left unsaid is what good shooting down an approaching aircraft with surface to air missiles would be - a hijacked commercial jet would be fast enough at low altitude to give an engagement window measured in seconds, not minutes, and even a &quot;successful&quot; shoot-down would simply scatter pieces of burning airplane over a slightly different part of densely-packed London than the hijacker intended.

Can you still call it &quot;security theater&quot; when a useless defensive measure is clearly, obviously just as bad as the threat it purports to counter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Left unsaid is what good shooting down an approaching aircraft with surface to air missiles would be &#8211; a hijacked commercial jet would be fast enough at low altitude to give an engagement window measured in seconds, not minutes, and even a &#8220;successful&#8221; shoot-down would simply scatter pieces of burning airplane over a slightly different part of densely-packed London than the hijacker intended.</p>
<p>Can you still call it &#8220;security theater&#8221; when a useless defensive measure is clearly, obviously just as bad as the threat it purports to counter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
