• Smithsonian
    Instiution
  • Smithsonian
    Journeys
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Smithsonian
    magazine

AirSpaceMag.com

  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Need to Know
  • How Things Work
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • The Daily Planet
  • Letters To Earth
  • The Once and Future Moon
  • The View from 30,000 Feet
  • On Air
  • AirRecon

March 23, 2011

Gimme the Good Old Days

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email | More

Crash test dummies aboard the Boeing 720, before the test. Credit: NASA

With ever-mounting budget cuts, and pressure to reduce the national deficit, NASA and the FAA just don’t crash airplanes intentionally like they used to. Here’s a golden oldie of a test the two agencies jointly conducted on December 1, 1984, when they took a Boeing 720 (a smaller, faster version of the 707) fully loaded with jet fuel and belly-flopped it onto the desert near Edwards Air Force Base in California. Engineers running the test, called the Controlled Impact Demonstration, were evaluating an anti-misting kerosene added to the standard Jet-A fuel, to see how the additive mitigated fuel ignition and flame propagation.

The test didn’t go quite as planned, as the remote control equipment used to direct the airplane brought it down off the centerline of the runway, with the left wing striking the ground first.

The researchers did get lots of useful data on features from test dummies to burn-resistant windows. But the fireball seen here, and the inferno that raged afterward, showed that a fuel additive wouldn’t make much difference in this kind of crash.



Posted By: Mike Klesius — History of Flight | Link | Comments (1)


1 Comment »

  1. I’ve always loved that the aircraft was off center line, etc. Real accidents are weird events and although I understand why the tests are structures just so and controls are put in place, it just seems more realistic when things don’t go as planned.

    Comment by Jay — April 2, 2011 @ 7:40 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Airspacemag.com has approved them. Airspacemag.com reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies. Airspacemag.com and the author also reserve the right to reprint comments submitted to the blog.

Advertisement



  • Join Us!

    1.  Twitter
    2.  Subscribe to RSS

  • Recent Posts

    • Unmanned X-47B Launches from a Carrier
    • Chris Hadfield’s Space Oddity
    • Lockheed’s Mom
    • Crowdsourcing Mars
    • The X-51 Ends on a High Note
  • Categories

    • Aerial Reconnaissance
    • Aerodynamics
    • Aerospace Business
    • Air Racing
    • Air Safety
    • Air Travel
    • Airships
    • Apollo Plus 40
    • Asteroids
    • Astronauts
    • Astronomy
    • Ballooning
    • Chinese Space Program
    • Commercial Spaceflight
    • Earth Science
    • Education
    • Extrasolar Planets
    • Flight Today
    • Future Flight
    • Helicopters
    • History of Flight
    • Human Spaceflight
    • Hypersonic Research
    • International Space Station
    • Interstellar Flight
    • Lunar Exploration
    • Mars Exploration
    • Military Aviation
    • Military Space Programs
    • Missile Defense
    • Model Aviation
    • Movies and Books
    • NASA
    • Parachuting
    • Planetary Exploration
    • Propulsion Research
    • Robot Vehicles
    • Rocketry
    • Satellites
    • SETI
    • Skydiving
    • Solar Sails
    • Space Exploration
    • Space Shuttle
    • Space Tourism
    • Test Pilots
    • UAV – Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    • Uncategorized
    • Video
    • Virtual Flight
    • Weather
  • Pages

    • About The Daily Planet
  • Blogs from AirSpaceMag.com

    • The Once and Future Moon By Paul D. Spudis
    • The View from 30,000 Feet By Steve Satre
  • Archives



Advertisement



Subscribe to Air & Space Magazine


View full archiveRecent Issues


  • 2011


  • 2010


  • 2009

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Member Services
  • About Air & Space
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics

Smithsonian Institution

Produced by Clickability