• Smithsonian
    Instiution
  • Smithsonian
    Journeys
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Smithsonian
    magazine

AirSpaceMag.com

  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Need to Know
  • How Things Work
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • The Daily Planet
  • Letters To Earth
  • The Once and Future Moon
  • The View from 30,000 Feet
  • On Air
  • AirRecon

June 24, 2010

Flying While Female

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email | More
Jerrie Cobb, one of the "Mercury 13." Courtesy NASM.

Jerrie Cobb, one of the "Mercury 13," circa 1963. Courtesy NASM.

China has selected its first two female astronauts, Space.com recently reported. But, unlike their male counterparts, females have to be married. “We believe married women would be more physically and psychologically mature,” Zhang Jianqui, the former deputy commander of China’s spaceflight program, is quoted as saying.

The Guardian goes one step further: They’ve reported that in addition to being married, the women must be mothers in order to qualify for the space program. The story reports that “Officials are concerned that space flight might affect [the women’s] fertility.”

When will we be done with this malarkey?

For the record, Russian cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova gave birth to a daughter one year after her 1963 flight. In Principles of Clinical Medicine for Space Flight (edited by Michael R. Barratt and Sam L. Pool in 2008), the authors note that 15 children have been born to 13 U.S. female astronauts who have completed at least one space flight.

If the Chinese are so concerned about the effects of space flight on reproduction, why aren’t male applicants required to be married with children?

During World War II, physicians believed that Women Airforce Service Pilots (WASP) shouldn’t fly during the “dysfunction of their menstrual cycle.” As Molly Merryman wrote in her history of the WASP, Clipped Wings, the Army Air Forces, after much study, concluded that menstruation had no effect on female pilots. But just a few years later, when a group of female pilots (usually referred to as “the Mercury 13”) was undergoing the physical tests for astronaut training, NASA wasn’t sure women could physically handle the demands of space. As journalist Martha Ackmann reported in The Mercury 13: The True Story of Thirteen Women and the Dream of Space Flight, some of the Mercury 13 “received advice from former WASPs about how to respond to the inevitable ‘menstruation question’ from physicians…. Women who served in the WASPs were so accustomed to hearing medical doctors voice concern about women flying during their menstrual periods that they developed their own response that allowed them to keep flying any time of the month. When asked by medical professionals, ‘How often do you get your period?’ many of the WASPs responded by saying they were ‘highly irregular.’ ”

Another reason given to keep U.S. women from being astronauts included the military’s assertion that partial pressure suits, worn by pilots and astronauts to survive high-altitude flight, couldn’t be adapted to fit the female form. (This despite that fact that David Clark, a major manufacture of pressure suits, designed them using women’s brassieres as a model.)

Ackmann includes the 1963 assessment of NASA psychologist Robert B. Voas, who felt the women-in-space program to be ridiculous: “As for the ladies’ alleged ability to withstand boredom and confinement better than the man, I think there might be a number of harried husbands who have sat through long evenings listening to the wife’s recitations of the day’s activities, who have credentials in the area of tolerance and boredom.”

And then there are the mind-numbing comments of Wernher von Braun, given in a 1962 speech on the Mississippi State College campus, on whether women should be in the space program: “Well, all I can say is that the male astronauts are all for it. And as my friend Bob Gilruth says, we’re reserving 110 pounds of payload for recreational equipment.”



Posted By: Rebecca Maksel — Human Spaceflight,Space Exploration | Link | Comments (0)


No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Airspacemag.com has approved them. Airspacemag.com reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies. Airspacemag.com and the author also reserve the right to reprint comments submitted to the blog.

Advertisement



  • Join Us!

    1.  Twitter
    2.  Subscribe to RSS

  • Recent Posts

    • Unmanned X-47B Launches from a Carrier
    • Chris Hadfield’s Space Oddity
    • Lockheed’s Mom
    • Crowdsourcing Mars
    • The X-51 Ends on a High Note
  • Categories

    • Aerial Reconnaissance
    • Aerodynamics
    • Aerospace Business
    • Air Racing
    • Air Safety
    • Air Travel
    • Airships
    • Apollo Plus 40
    • Asteroids
    • Astronauts
    • Astronomy
    • Ballooning
    • Chinese Space Program
    • Commercial Spaceflight
    • Earth Science
    • Education
    • Extrasolar Planets
    • Flight Today
    • Future Flight
    • Helicopters
    • History of Flight
    • Human Spaceflight
    • Hypersonic Research
    • International Space Station
    • Interstellar Flight
    • Lunar Exploration
    • Mars Exploration
    • Military Aviation
    • Military Space Programs
    • Missile Defense
    • Model Aviation
    • Movies and Books
    • NASA
    • Parachuting
    • Planetary Exploration
    • Propulsion Research
    • Robot Vehicles
    • Rocketry
    • Satellites
    • SETI
    • Skydiving
    • Solar Sails
    • Space Exploration
    • Space Shuttle
    • Space Tourism
    • Test Pilots
    • UAV – Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    • Uncategorized
    • Video
    • Virtual Flight
    • Weather
  • Pages

    • About The Daily Planet
  • Blogs from AirSpaceMag.com

    • The Once and Future Moon By Paul D. Spudis
    • The View from 30,000 Feet By Steve Satre
  • Archives



Advertisement



Subscribe to Air & Space Magazine


View full archiveRecent Issues


  • 2011


  • 2010


  • 2009

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Member Services
  • About Air & Space
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics

Smithsonian Institution

Produced by Clickability